Here we are trying to give away $250 to anyone who can demonstrate that Richard Burr has led something of significance in his 16 years in Congress, and after four long days, we've received only one entry that's even close to a legitimate contribution. Given that nearly 5,000 people check out BlueNC every week, I'm struck by the silence on this question.
What's the problem?
- Is Burr's record so obviously bankrupt that no one will even entertain trying to defend him?
- Do people feel like the submissions won't get a fair shake? Note, the plan is to post all submissions in a poll and let anyone (not just registered members) vote on which piece of legislation is most significant.
Help me out here, folks.