Tuesday Twitter roundup

Do me a favor and listen to this brief (less than 15 minutes) podcast. You won't regret it.

This is the closest thing I could find, filed last year by Pittman:

"Sec. 39. Life begins at fertilization. It is a matter of indisputable scientific fact that a distinct and separate human life begins at the moment of fertilization. As such, that new human life is recognized by the State as an individual person, entitled to the protection of the laws of this State from the moment of fertilization until the moment of natural death. Any person who willfully seeks to destroy the life of another person, by any means, at any stage of life, or succeeds in doing so, shall be held accountable for attempted murder or for first degree murder, respectively. Any person has the right to defend his or her own life or the life of another person, even by the use of deadly force if necessary, from willful destruction by another person. The State has an interest and a duty to defend innocent persons from willful destruction of their lives and to punish those who take the lives of persons, born or unborn, who have not committed any crime punishable by death."

a) it's a Constitutional Amendment, meaning it would have to go before the voters. b) 1st Degree Murder could carry the death penalty, but all it takes in 1 juror to say, "Oh, hell no." We've got more important things to do than chase Pittman's tail.

What Cheri said. This ain't inflation, it's piracy.

Policy? Open their bag, there's nothing in there, except rotten tomatoes to throw at Democrats' ideas.

My god, you really are an idiot.

You got that right, wolfie. Bishop is an oxygen thief.

Okay, this post was considerably longer before I accidentally CLOSED THE TAB and had to start over, but there's something to be said for brevity (yes, that's an excuse). Here's your Onion:

Yeah, that's...not really...



Bonus Onion:

Tee-hee... :)