A Conservative Locke on the Paper?

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Lance has already given a brief mention to the Public Editor's column in today's News and Observer, but there's a story inside the story that may be worth your while.

First, though, kudos to Ted Vaden for actually looking into this question. I've written him about a handful of bias issues and I fully expected him to blow this one off too. So I was surprised to learn last week that he was actually looking into the story - and I appreciate his effort.

The column itself is surprisingly candid. Vaden takes N&O reporters to task for their over-reliance on John Locke Foundation propaganda, all the while admiring the right wing thing tank for its marketing prowess.

John Hood, the foundation's ever-quotable president, makes no apologies for that and indeed, says one reason for his organization's creation "was to ensure that the public policy discussion includes these conservative views." But he says media manipulation is not part of the plan.

"If your goal is just to get the conservative message out, that will not be effective," he said. "What I try to encourage my staff to do is to provide usefulness and value to journalists seeking to provide balance in coverage of public policy issues."

Media manipulation is not part of the plan? That's rich - and more than a little ridiculous. Media manipulation is the entire plan. Why else would the Puppetmaster be spending millions of dollars each year to drive his propaganda machine? Why else would the creation of every John Locke Foundation "report" start with its foregone conclusions and then find data and evidence to back those conclusions up?

Ted Vaden got one thing dead right. The John Locke Foundation is an opinion manufacturer that is itself a story.

Which raises this question: Why is the right wing think tank such a huge deal in Raleigh, when it's virtually irrelevant at the News and Observer's sister paper in Charlotte? This is a big chunk of the story that Mr. Vaden neglected. And you can see why.

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

In case it's not entirely clear, what's playing out here in North Carolina is just a microcosm of the national disgrace that is the mainstream media. Big Media - like Big Oil, Big Pharma, Big Corn, Big Bulldozers and Big War - are just another cog in the corporatization of democracy. And because right wing interests are so closely aligned with Big Business interests, you can always count on them having undue influence.

That's what we're up against. And it ain't pretty. In fact, Ted Vaden's opening paragraph nails the problem nicely.

Is the N&O a shill for the right wing? That criticism would surprise a lot of our readers, but it's one being made lately by some folks who see excessive attention to the conservative John Locke Foundation in the pages of The News & Observer. Emphasis added.

The editors at the N&O often say that they get plenty of criticism from right-wing Neanderthals who argue loudly that the paper is nothing but a liberal mouthpiece for that scumbag Bill Clinton. (Yes, they still drag out old Bill.) That's how bad things have gotten. What used to be the political "middle" has slid so far to the right that some people actually consider the N&O to be too liberal. And I can't decide whether to laugh or cry.



A self-described progressive website?

I wonder when you go from being "self-described" to just "a progressive website?"

Is the John Locke Foundation a self-described breeding ground for right-wing propaganda?


Self-described opinion-makers?

CountryCrats - my thoughts, my blog.

Jesus Swept ticked me off. Too short. I loved the characters and then POOF it was over.

great article

Its a good thing that no one I know trusted the N&O before this.

Its not just that they lean to the right, that is fine, every paper leans one way or another. Its that their paper is lazy and unable to actually figure stuff out. Their reliance on JLF is just one easy to find example.

Lyndon Helton for NC Senate

"Keep the Faith"

Yes Yes!

Exactly! To me the biggest issue in the media today, is not the right-wing and the corporate bias (those are certainly big problems). It's the laziness of the reporters. How many times did this article mention the need to "get conservative voices" in the paper? Now compare that to how many times the article mentioned things like actually finding the truth behind statements or using supporting evidence (i.e. facts) to help readers understand an issue.

The JLF, like all right-wing trash heaps deals in distortion and obfuscation. It's their bread and butter. I mean, they sold freaking supply-side and trickle-down economics for crying out loud! And the media for the past 20 or 30 years have eaten it up because they're lazy and don't want to take the time to actually find and/or learn about the data to see if the right-wing talking points are true.

So instead, they toss in a quote from JLF, maybe a quote from Democracy NC (if we're lucky) and call it a day and think that they're doing their job. Far fricking from it.

I'm temporarily on hiatus from living in NC, so hopefully you guys will let me know, but I would weap tears of joy if someday the N&O printed a story saying how our top income tax bracket of 8.25% isn't actually driving away jobs and investment. Maybe someone could do a little research on state benchmarks and look at the correlation between tax rates to put that baby to bed once and for all.

reporting v. journalism?

I'm once again left agog (sp?). Of course they are searching for the conservative side, because that is what reporters do. They report what others want them to, they dig up the facts and present them with a conclusion. That would be too much work.

CountryCrats - my thoughts, my blog.

Jesus Swept ticked me off. Too short. I loved the characters and then POOF it was over.